© Belish / Adobe Stock
Jump to
Job Ghosting in Recruiting
TL;DR: The 5 most important findings
- Job ghosting is the sudden, unexplained loss of contact during the application process, which can occur on both sides.
- The main reasons for ghosting by applicants are more attractive job offers, an excessively long or non-transparent application process and the fear of a confrontational rejection.
- The most effective way for companies to counteract ghosting is through a fast, transparent and appreciative application process with clear communication.
- A structured pre-boarding program that actively bridges the time between signing the contract and the first day of work is crucial to strengthen loyalty and prevent no-shows.
- Ultimately, ghosting is a symptom of a dysfunctional relationship, which is why building an authentic employer brand and a culture of respect is the most sustainable prevention strategy.
Job Ghosting: definition and dynamics
The abrupt disappearance of applicants or the sudden silence of companies has become a costly and frustrating reality in modern recruiting.
Job ghosting refers to the unexpected and complete cessation of communication by either party, candidate or employer, during the recruitment process without any explanation or warning. The term has been adopted from online dating, where non-committal and often depersonalized interactions are commonplace.
This parallel is significant because it reflects a similar development in the job market: The rise of digital application platforms and virtual interviews has made the process more transactional and impersonal, lowering the psychological barrier to breaking contact for both parties.
Historically, ghosting was a behavior primarily practiced by employers who held power in a supply-driven labor market. However, a profound change, driven by the widespread skills shortage, has shifted this balance of power. In many sectors, candidates are now in a stronger negotiating position, leading to a mirror-image behavior.
This phenomenon is more than a collection of isolated cases; it is a self-reinforcing cycle. Decades of experience with unanswered applications have established a negative norm among job seekers. Now that they have a choice, they mimic the behavior they have experienced themselves. Studies show that applicants who have been ghosted themselves show a higher propensity to ghoste as well. This leads to a systemic erosion of professionalism and trust that makes the entire hiring process more inefficient for everyone involved.
Manifestations and phases: When and how “ghosts” appear
Ghosting can occur at any stage of the recruitment process, with the negative impact on the company increasing with each step.
Ghosting by job applicants:
- No response to the first contact by recruiters.
- Failure to show up for an agreed interview, a very common form according to studies.
- Breaking off communication after one or more successful interviews.
- Verbally accepting an offer without ever signing the contract.
- The most damaging variant: the new employee does not show up on the first day of work despite having signed the contract (“No-Show Day 1”).
Ghosting by companies:
- No confirmation of receipt or feedback on a submitted application.
- Silence after an interview, leaving the candidate in uncertainty.
- Withdrawal of a verbal or written offer without further communication.
The prevalence of the phenomenon is well documented by data. A study by the Stepstone Group found that 64% of job seekers say they have been ghosted by companies. Conversely, according to Indeed, 76% of employers report ghosting experiences with candidates. The Institute for Employment Research (IAB) found that in one in four German companies with unfilled training places, applicants dropping out is a major reason, which underlines the concrete economic damage.
Causes and motivations for job ghosting
In order to effectively counter ghosting at work, a deep understanding of the underlying motivations is essential.
The applicant’s perspective: Why talented people drop out
- Competing offers: By far the most common reason is the existence of a better or more compelling job offer. In a competitive candidate market, it is common to pursue several application processes in parallel.
- Poor candidate experience: A slow, non-transparent or impersonal application process is a strong driver for breaking off contact. If the process takes too long, interest wanes. A lack of transparency about the next steps or unreliable communication on the part of recruiters frustrates applicants and causes them to turn away.
- Avoiding confrontation: Many applicants find it uncomfortable to formally decline an offer, especially after face-to-face interviews. The fear of a potentially unpleasant conversation leads to the supposedly easier path of silence being chosen.
- Discrepancy between expectation and reality: Companies often invest heavily in their employer branding, creating a positive expectation. If the reality of the application process does not match this expectation, a cognitive dissonance arises. The candidate concludes: “If the company treats me like this while it is recruiting me, what will it be like once I am employed?”
The company perspective: Why employers remain silent
The silence on the part of the company usually has pragmatic reasons, even if they are unsatisfactory for the applicant:
- Process overload: HR departments are often confronted with a flood of applications and do not have the resources to give each individual candidate personal feedback.
- Poor organization: Sudden hiring freezes due to budget changes, internal restructuring or changes in priorities can abruptly end an ongoing process. These internal decisions are often not communicated externally.
- Strategic hesitation (“benching”): Companies deliberately keep second-placed candidates in limbo in case the first choice rejects the offer. This leads to long waiting times without information for the “Plan B”.
- “Ghost jobs”: An increasingly criticized practice in which jobs are advertised without any real intention of hiring. Motives can be to sound out the market, fulfill internal tendering obligations or project an image of growth. This inevitably leads to applicants not receiving any feedback.Vergleichende Analyse: Formen, Gründe und Gegenmaßnahmen
The following table compares the most common forms of job ghosting with the probable causes and the most effective countermeasures. It serves as a practical diagnostic tool for HR managers.
| Form of ghosting (symptom) | Probable causes (diagnosis) | Strategic countermeasures (recipe) |
| Applicant does not show up for the interview | Better offer received; process too long/impersonal; discomfort with rejection; poor communication. | Speed up the recruiting process; build personal relationships; communicate salary ranges early on; send automated appointment reminders. |
| Applicant breaks off contact after interview | Negative impression of the company/manager; unclear job profile; inadequate offer; better offer received. | Live authentic employer branding; train managers for interviews; give clear feedback and timetable for next steps; make competitive offers. |
| New employee does not appear on the first day of work | Counteroffer from the old employer; “cold feet” due to lack of commitment in the pre-boarding phase; change in personal circumstances. | Implement a structured preboarding program; regular contact by manager/buddy; create an emotional bond before the first day of work. |
Strategic intervention: A guideline for the prevention of job ghosting
The prevention of job ghosting is based on three pillars.
Pillar 1: Optimization of the recruiting process – speed, transparency, communication
- Speed is crucial: A long application process is one of the main reasons for candidates dropping out. Companies need to streamline their internal processes, limit the number of interview rounds and make decisions quickly.
- Transparency right from the start: Communicate the entire process flow, including realistic time frames for decisions, right from the first contact. Open communication about the salary range avoids disappointment at later stages and filters out inappropriate expectations at an early stage.
- Communication as a service: Treat applicants like customers. Every point of contact is an opportunity to strengthen the employer brand. Use personalized approaches instead of generic templates and give feedback to all interviewed candidates – even an appreciative rejection can leave a positive impression.
- Make targeted use of technology: Modern applicant tracking systems (ATS) can automate routine tasks such as scheduling and confirmations of receipt. This ensures that no candidate falls through the cracks and gives recruiters more time for personal interaction.
Pillar 2: The critical phase – preboarding and onboarding as a retention tool
The period between signing the contract and the first day of work harbors the highest risk of ghosting. The candidate’s initial euphoria often gives way to a phase of uncertainty in which counter-offers from the old employer or doubts can cause the decision made to waver. Passive waiting on the part of the new employer creates a dangerous vacuum.
A strategic preboarding program fills this gap and transforms the administrative waiting period into a phase of active retention promotion. It’s about cementing the new employee’s psychological commitment and transforming their identity from “applicant” to “team member” before they even enter the office.
Concrete preboarding measures:
- Personal greeting: A personal email or a short phone call from the direct manager immediately after signing the contract to express the joy of the commitment.
- Social integration: The introduction of a “buddy” from the team who is available for informal questions and an invitation to an informal team event (virtual or on-site) build social bridges.
- Continuous flow of information: Send relevant information in small, digestible portions, e.g. about the team structure, current projects or a welcome guide. This maintains contact without being overwhelming.
- Reduce administrative hurdles: Make it possible to fill out personnel forms and other formalities digitally before the first day of work. This is efficient and conveys progress.
Preboarding designed in this way flows seamlessly into structured onboarding, which continues the positive experience and confirms to the new employee that they have made the right decision.
Pillar 3: Employer branding and value-based fit
An authentic and positively perceived employer brand acts like an inoculation against ghosting. Candidates who decide not only for the job, but also for the culture, values and mission of a company, have a significantly higher intrinsic motivation and loyalty. The application process itself is the most effective instrument of employer branding: a respectful, transparent and efficient process confirms the brand promise, while a poor process devalues it.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Is job ghosting by an applicant after signing a contract legally relevant?
Yes, non-attendance despite a valid employment contract is a breach of contract that can theoretically lead to claims for damages, but these are difficult to enforce in practice.
How do I react when a top candidate hosts my company?
Try to make contact once or twice via different channels; if this is unsuccessful, tick the candidate off and focus on other applicants or restart the process.
Should we put candidates on a “blacklist” who ghost us?
Although understandable, this is not recommended because it can damage the company’s reputation and the reasons for ghosting are often unknown; instead, focus on process improvement.
When is an applicant officially considered a “ghost”?
If an applicant does not respond to several contact attempts via different channels within a reasonable period of time (e.g. 3-5 working days), it can be assumed that ghosting has taken place.
Is it more expensive to prevent ghosting or to look for a new candidate?
Prevention through process optimization and preboarding is significantly cheaper in the long term than the repeated costs of a completely new recruiting process.
Does it help to state the salary in the job advertisement to avoid ghosting?
Yes, specifying a salary range creates transparency right from the start and reduces the risk of candidates dropping out late in the process due to unsuitable salary expectations.
What role does the manager play in preventing ghosting?
A decisive one: Personal contact and appreciation from the future manager during the application and pre-boarding process is one of the strongest retention factors.
Do countermeasures also work in sectors with an extremely high number of applicants?
Yes, automated but appreciative processes (e.g. through a good ATS) are essential to manage communication and protect your own reputation.
Is remote work a factor that increases or decreases ghosting?
Remote processes can increase depersonalization and thus the tendency to ghosting, which is why conscious, personal points of contact are even more important here.
What is the first step we should take as a company?
Analyze your current application process, identify the duration and communication gaps and implement immediate, clear feedback for all applicants.
Summary
Job ghosting is becoming more and more of a problem for both companies and applicants. Companies can significantly reduce the no-show rate of applicants by paying attention to a few things. These include, for example, close support for new employees even before the actual onboarding.
